191711P.pdf   05/13/2020  United States  v.  The-Nimrod Sterling
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1711
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Gruender, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in allowing 
   defendant to proceed pro se on the hearing to modify the conditions of his 
   supervised release; the court did not err in granting the Probation 
   Office's motion to add two special conditions of supervised release; based 
   on testimony regarding defendant's current mental conditions, it was not 
   error to require a mental health assessment be performed; nor did the 
   court err in imposing a search condition based on reasonable suspicion; 
   the court erred, however,in requiring defendant to provide the probation 
   office with access to any business record or financial information, as the 
   condition is vague and overbroad and is not warranted by the 
   circumstances; the condition is vacated.