DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
191814P.pdf 03/03/2020 Tonia Ackerman v. U-Park, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 19-1814
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Gruender and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Negligence. In this slip-and-fall case, the district court
did not err in granting defendant's motion to exclude plaintiff's expert's
testimony; in the absence of any record evidence that the expert used
reliable principles and methods or applied them reasonably to the facts of
this case to form his opinion that plaintiff's fall was caused by black
ice forming in a "birdbath" type of depression, the evidence did not
satisfy the Rule 702 standards for admissibility; applying Nebraska law on
the duty of care owed business invitees, the district court properly
granted defendant's motion for summary judgment as there was no evidence
in the record from which the court can draw a reasonable inference that if
the ice was visible and apparent that plaintiff would not have discovered
the danger or failed to protect herself against it. Judge Kelly,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.