DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

191814P.pdf   03/03/2020  Tonia Ackerman  v.  U-Park, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1814
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Gruender and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Negligence. In this slip-and-fall case, the district court did not err in granting defendant's motion to exclude plaintiff's expert's testimony; in the absence of any record evidence that the expert used reliable principles and methods or applied them reasonably to the facts of this case to form his opinion that plaintiff's fall was caused by black ice forming in a "birdbath" type of depression, the evidence did not satisfy the Rule 702 standards for admissibility; applying Nebraska law on the duty of care owed business invitees, the district court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment as there was no evidence in the record from which the court can draw a reasonable inference that if the ice was visible and apparent that plaintiff would not have discovered the danger or failed to protect herself against it. Judge Kelly, concurring in part and dissenting in part.