DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
191919P.pdf 04/13/2020 United States v. Terrance Brown
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 19-1919
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Wollman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law. During the pre-trial proceedings defendant
clearly and unequivocally asserted his right to self-representation, and
the court did not err in having him proceed pro se with his federal public
defender as stand-by counsel; even assuming this brief absence of counsel
was error, the error was harmless as defendant was without counsel at the
suppression hearing during the direct examination of only one government
witness and for a portion of the cross-examination of that witness; his
stand-by counsel completed the cross-examination, and the court continued
the hearing to allow his attorney time to prepare for the other witnesses;
defendant is unable to point to any deficiencies in counsel's work or show
that his motion to suppress would have been granted had counsel performed
the initial cross-examination.