DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

191919P.pdf   04/13/2020  United States  v.  Terrance Brown
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1919
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph   
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Wollman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. During the pre-trial proceedings defendant clearly and unequivocally asserted his right to self-representation, and the court did not err in having him proceed pro se with his federal public defender as stand-by counsel; even assuming this brief absence of counsel was error, the error was harmless as defendant was without counsel at the suppression hearing during the direct examination of only one government witness and for a portion of the cross-examination of that witness; his stand-by counsel completed the cross-examination, and the court continued the hearing to allow his attorney time to prepare for the other witnesses; defendant is unable to point to any deficiencies in counsel's work or show that his motion to suppress would have been granted had counsel performed the initial cross-examination.