DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

192227P.pdf   12/18/2020  Maureen Johnson  v.  Safeco Insurance Company of IL
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-2227
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Benton and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Insurance. Because plaintiff had already received from her 
   employer's Uninsured Motorist (UIM) Coverage a sum greater than the 
   maximum possible UIM Coverage under her own insurance, her insurer did not 
   owe her any additional recovery; preventing plaintiff from stacking the 
   two UIM coverage provisions did not render her insurer's coverage 
   illusory, as it is undisputed that her insurer would have paid her if her 
   recovery from her employer's policy was less than the applicable limit for 
   all UIM coverage.