DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

192247P.pdf   12/15/2020  United States  v.  Jose Carrillo
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-2247
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Council Bluffs   
   [PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Kelly and Wollman, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. The district court did not 
   err in rejecting defendant's argument that his prosecutions in South 
   Dakota and Iowa violated double jeopardy because when defendant pleaded 
   guilty in this Iowa case, he had not yet pleaded guilty in the South 
   Dakota case and jeopardy had not attached in that case; under this unusual 
   scenario defendant should have filed a motion to dismiss the South Dakota 
   charge after he pleaded guilty in Iowa; as a result, the district court 
   could not have erred when it refused to dismiss the Iowa conspiracy 
   charge; defendant's sentence, a downward variance, was not substantively 
   unreasonable.