DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

192612P.pdf   07/15/2020  David Russell  v.  Edward Anderson
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-2612
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln   
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Colloton, Circuit Judge, and Williams, District Judge] Civil case - Torts. District court's comments during witness presentations did not rise to the level of plain error; plaintiff's $7,000 verdict was not against the weight of the evidence as the amount awarded bore a reasonable relation to the damages proved; the district court erred in dismissing plaintiff's loss-of-earnings capacity claim, but the error was harmless in light of the jury's verdict on the remaining claims because no reasonable jury could have found permanent impairment or or dimmunition of plaintiff's earning capacity; the district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding cross-examination of the sheriff as to the reasons for not issuing defendant a ticket, as the questioning would have been misleading and could have led to jury confusion; the evidence was, in any event, cumulative as to other evidence regarding possible bias the sheriff may have had in favor of defendant at the time of the accident.