193053P.pdf   01/08/2021  United States  v.  Joe Rodriguez
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-3053
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Loken, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The evidence was sufficient to support 
   defendant's conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 
   methamphetamine within the time period alleged in the indictment; claim 
   that the court erred in permitting the jury to view a transcript before 
   defense counsel had an opportunity to review it and take a position on its 
   accuracy is not supported by the facts, which showed counsel received it 
   by email, agreed to stipulate to its foundation and admissibility and 
   confirmed this agreement with the district court; defendant waived any 
   right that he might have had against the presentation of the transcript 
   and if the district court did not err by permitting the jury to see it, it 
   could not err, plainly or otherwise, by failing to give a curative 
   instruction.