DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
193196P.pdf 03/10/2021 Lukeus Scott v. Key Energy Services, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 19-3196
U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Products Liability. Plaintiff was injured when a Hydra-Walk
system he was operating for Key, his employer, overturned; he obtain
workers' compensation benefits from Key and then sued Key and Hydra-Walk
alleging the system was defective and unreasonably dangerous; Key, which
had purchased Hydra-Walk five years before plaintiff was injured, moved
for summary judgment , asserting that workers' compensation was
plaintiff's exclusive remedy. Held: Hydra-Walk is not a third-party
tortfeasor for purposes of determining whether plaintiff may pursue a
remedy; Hyrda-Walk no longer exists under North Dakota law and plaintiff
cannot maintain a claim against it; North Dakota's Supreme Court has never
allowed an employee to successfully recover against an employer where the
employee was injured by equipment manufactured by another company prior to
that company's merger with the employer and the injury occurred
post-merger; without further indication that the North Dakota Supreme
Court would be receptive to application of the dual persona doctrine, the
court is unwilling to apply it for the first time to plaintiff's claims;
nor would North Dakota Supreme Court recognize the dual capacity exception
to the exclusive remedy rule. Judge Kelly, dissenting.