DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

193232P.pdf   04/07/2021  Oakley Engesser  v.  Edward Fox
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-3232
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City   
[PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Colloton and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights.In action alleging defendants had violated plaintiff's civil rights by recklessly investigating a fatal one-car accident and prosecuting him as the driver, there was no evidence to show defendant Trooper Fox recklessly or purposefully ignored two eyewitnesses which indicated the passenger in the vehicle may have been driving as the statements did not fit with the evidence at the scene of the crime and any failure to undertake further questioning or investigation was at most negligence and did not shock the conscience; defendant officers' decision to leave the car at an impound lot did not rise to the level of reckless or purposeful misconduct and their actions did not demonstrate that the officers recklessly or purposefully destroyed evidence; because plaintiff cannot establish a constitutional violation on the part of the officers, his claim for supervisory liability fails, as does his conspiracy claim. Judge Colloton, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.