DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

193485P.pdf   12/11/2020  United States  v.  Stephen Fine
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-3485
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Gruender and Grasz, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in denying 
   defendant's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 
   3582(c)(1)(A)(i); defendant's challenge was a challenge to his sentence, 
   which can only be brought through a Section 2255 motion; as defendant did 
   not seek authorization to file a successive motion as required by 28 
   U.S.C. Sec. 2255(h), the district court was correct in determining that 
   defendant's challenge to his career offender determination was an 
   unauthorized successive habeas; rehabilitation, alone, is not an 
   extraordinary and compelling reason for a sentencing reduction under 28 
   U.S.C. Sec. 944(t).