DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

193528P.pdf   12/23/2020  United States  v.  Edward Lee Smith
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-3528
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Loken and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Where defendant was convicted of a new offense 
   and violation of the provisions of his supervised release, the district 
   court did not err in making the two sentences consecutive; the district 
   court did not treat the Section 7B1.3(f) of the Guidelines as mandatory 
   regarding consecutive sentences and understood the guidelines were 
   advisory; the decision to make the sentences consecutive was a proper 
   exercise of the district court's discretion.