193555P.pdf   09/17/2021  United States  v.  Steven Traylor
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-3555
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Melloy and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. For the court's earlier opinion remanding 
   the case for further consideration of defendant's motion to suppress, see 
   U.S. v. Traylor,840 D. App'x 894, 894-895 (8th cir. 2021). On remand, the 
   district court was authorized to supplement its factual findings, and 
   there was no error in finding additional facts; the totality of the 
   circumstances added up to reasonable suspicion of drug-related activity, 
   and the brief extension of the traffic stop to facilitate a dog sniff of 
   the vehicle was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. 
  
193555U.pdf   03/25/2021  United States  v.  Steven Traylor
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-3555
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Colloton, Melloy, and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court erred in determining when 
   a drug dog arrived at the traffic stop involved in the case, and this was 
   a plain error that affected defendant's substantial rights; while there 
   may be another argument for extending the seizure until the drug dog 
   arrived, it would be better for the district court to make the necessary 
   factual findings and to resolve the issue of reasonable suspicion in the 
   first instance; the matter is remanded for further consideration of the 
   motion to suppress; the court retains jurisdiction over the appeal during 
   the limited remand.