DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

193638P.pdf   05/18/2021  United States  v.  Kurt Harrington
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-3638
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport   
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Benton and Stras, Circuit Judges] Prisoner case -Habeas. For the court's prior opinion affirming Harrington's convictions, see U.S. v. Harrington, 617 F.3de 1063 (8th Cir. 2010). Defendant's appeal of an order permitting retrial on distribution of heroin resulting in death charges after the grant of Section 2255 relief presented a colorable double-jeopardy claim, and the court had jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal; Harrington's retrial on the resulting-in-death elements of the counts charging conspiracy to distribute heroin resulting in death and distribution of heroin resulting in death would not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause; Herrington sought habeas relief based on a post-conviction change in the law as to what the government had to establish in order to prove the resulting-in-death elements of the two counts; because the insufficiency in proof was caused by the change in the law and not because of the government's failure to muster evidence, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not prohibit Harrinton's retrial.