DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
193638P.pdf 05/18/2021 United States v. Kurt Harrington
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 19-3638
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Benton and Stras, Circuit Judges]
Prisoner case -Habeas. For the court's prior opinion affirming
Harrington's convictions, see U.S. v. Harrington, 617 F.3de 1063 (8th Cir.
2010). Defendant's appeal of an order permitting retrial on distribution
of heroin resulting in death charges after the grant of Section 2255
relief presented a colorable double-jeopardy claim, and the court had
jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal; Harrington's retrial on the
resulting-in-death elements of the counts charging conspiracy to
distribute heroin resulting in death and distribution of heroin resulting
in death would not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause; Herrington sought
habeas relief based on a post-conviction change in the law as to what the
government had to establish in order to prove the resulting-in-death
elements of the two counts; because the insufficiency in proof was caused
by the change in the law and not because of the government's failure to
muster evidence, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not prohibit Harrinton's
retrial.