DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

193691P.pdf   06/03/2021  Mark Donelson  v.  Ameriprise Financial Svcs, Inc
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-3691
                          and No:  19-3693
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
[PUBLISHED] Gruender, Author, with Benton and Stras, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Securities law. In action alleging defendants had traded in plaintiff's account in violation of 10(b) and Section 20 of the Securities Exchange Act and in violation of its fiduciary duties under Sec. 206 of the Investment Advisors Act, the district court abused its discretion in denying defendants' motion to strike plaintiff's class-action allegations; the court has jurisdiction to review the denial of the motion to strike because this denial was contained in an order reviewable under 9 U.S.C. Sec. 16(a)(1)(B); defendants did not waive their right to arbitrate plaintiff's claim by moving to strike the class-action allegations at the same time they moved to compel arbitration as the action was not inconsistent with the defendants' right to arbitrate and did not substantially invoke the litigation machinery; under the client agreement, defendants had the right to compel arbitration of the disputes as the provision was supported by mutual consent, was supported by consideration and was not unconscionable; this valid arbitration clause encompassed the dispute between the parties.