DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

193783P.pdf   05/06/2021  Thomas Lissick  v.  Andersen Corporation
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-3783
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Stras and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case. The district court did not err in granting defendant summary 
   judgment on plaintiff's claim defendant violated the Minnesota 
   Whistleblower Act by terminating him in retaliation for making a sexual 
   harassment claim as well as for making a claim that two other employees 
   had filed fraudulent documents as he was unable to show a causal 
   connection between the protected activity and his discharge; claim of 
   retaliatory discharge in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act 
   failed for lack of causation; claim of FMLA retaliation also failed for 
   lack of causation.