201077P.pdf   04/27/2021  United States  v.  Brendon Janis
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-1077
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. The district court did not 
   abuse its discretion or improperly vouch for witnesses by explaining 
   Criminal Rule 35 after defense counsel made several references to it while 
   cross-examining the government's witnesses; the district court did not 
   clearly err by relying on trial testimony in calculating the drug quantity 
   attributable to defendant for sentencing; the district court did not err 
   in imposing the standard condition of supervised release which requires a 
   supervised person, when directed by the probation officer, to notify a 
   person that defendant may present a risk to that person, as this standard 
   condition is neither unconstitutionally vague nor an impermissible 
   delegation of power.