DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

201469P.pdf   03/31/2021  United States  v.  Michael Willins
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-1469
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Gruender and Stras, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. In prosecution for attempted enticement of a 
   minor and travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, the 
   district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding testimony from 
   defendant's proposed expert that defendant was not attracted to minors and 
   regarding the role of fantasy in chat rooms; the court need not decide 
   whether the proposed expert testimony violated Rule 704(b)as the evidence 
   supporting defendant's convictions was overwhelming; defendant never used 
   a chat room and the court did not err in excluding the testimony regarding 
   chat rooms and fantasy; evidence was sufficient to support defendant's 
   convictions for attempted enticement of a minor through an adult 
   intermediary.