DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

201595P.pdf   09/07/2021  Jacobson Warehouse Co., Inc.  v.  Schnuck Markets, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-1595
                          and No:  20-1690
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Grasz and Kobes, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Contracts and torts. A provision of the parties' contract unambiguously bars defendant from recovering non-direct damages from plaintiff; the provision does not violate Missouri public policy; the district court did not err in determining at summary judgment that three categories of defendant's damages - lost profits, expenses incurred in moving inventory and stocking stores and expenses incurred in correcting plaintiff's alleged mismanagement - were consequential damages and barred by the agreement; the district court did not err in entering judgment as a matter of law for plaintiff on defendant's negligence counterclaim as defendant did not provide sufficient evidence to show plaintiff breached a duty of care other than it contractual duty under the agreement; the district court did not abuse its discretion by determining that two emails defendant sought to exclude did not seek or reflect legal advice and were not, therefore, protected by the attorney-client privilege; no error in allowing plaintiff prejudgment interest on its claim for action on account; concerning plaintiff's cross-appeal, the district court did not err in denying plaintiff judgment as a matter of law on defendant's breach of contract claim and did not err in denying plaintiff's motion for an award of attorneys' fees, as a contract provision on which plaintiff relies did not authorize recovery of fees.