DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
201595P.pdf 09/07/2021 Jacobson Warehouse Co., Inc. v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 20-1595
and No: 20-1690
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Grasz and Kobes, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Contracts and torts. A provision of the parties' contract
unambiguously bars defendant from recovering non-direct damages from
plaintiff; the provision does not violate Missouri public policy; the
district court did not err in determining at summary judgment that three
categories of defendant's damages - lost profits, expenses incurred in
moving inventory and stocking stores and expenses incurred in correcting
plaintiff's alleged mismanagement - were consequential damages and barred
by the agreement; the district court did not err in entering judgment as a
matter of law for plaintiff on defendant's negligence counterclaim as
defendant did not provide sufficient evidence to show plaintiff breached a
duty of care other than it contractual duty under the agreement; the
district court did not abuse its discretion by determining that two emails
defendant sought to exclude did not seek or reflect legal advice and were
not, therefore, protected by the attorney-client privilege; no error in
allowing plaintiff prejudgment interest on its claim for action on
account; concerning plaintiff's cross-appeal, the district court did not
err in denying plaintiff judgment as a matter of law on defendant's breach
of contract claim and did not err in denying plaintiff's motion for an
award of attorneys' fees, as a contract provision on which plaintiff
relies did not authorize recovery of fees.