DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
201724P.pdf 01/23/2024 Sergio Mencia-Medina v. Merrick B. Garland
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 20-1724
Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Petition for Review - Immigration. For the court's prior opinion
dismissing petitioner's petition for review on the ground he had not
exhausted his argument before the Board, see Mencia-Medina v. Garland, 6
F.4th 846 (8th Cir. 2021), vacated and remanded by the Supreme Court for
further consideration in light of Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 598 U.S. 411
(2023). In his immigration proceedings, petitioner admitted he was
removable, but sought discretionary "special rule" cancellation as a child
who had been battered by a permanent resident parent - see 8 U.S.C. sec.
1229b(b)(2). The IJ granted cancellation of removal, but the Board
reversed, finding petitioner did not merit a favorable exercise of
discretion, considering his criminal record. The Board permissibly weighed
the evidence differently than the IJ without impermissibly finding facts
or disregarding the factual findings of the IJ; the court lacks
jurisdiction to review an ultimate decision denying cancellation as a
matter of agency discretion; petitioner's claim that the Board's decision
is internally inconsistent and unreasoned is insufficient to establish
appellate jurisdiction.