DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

201724P.pdf   01/23/2024  Sergio Mencia-Medina  v.  Merrick B. Garland
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-1724
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. For the court's prior opinion dismissing petitioner's petition for review on the ground he had not exhausted his argument before the Board, see Mencia-Medina v. Garland, 6 F.4th 846 (8th Cir. 2021), vacated and remanded by the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, 598 U.S. 411 (2023). In his immigration proceedings, petitioner admitted he was removable, but sought discretionary "special rule" cancellation as a child who had been battered by a permanent resident parent - see 8 U.S.C. sec. 1229b(b)(2). The IJ granted cancellation of removal, but the Board reversed, finding petitioner did not merit a favorable exercise of discretion, considering his criminal record. The Board permissibly weighed the evidence differently than the IJ without impermissibly finding facts or disregarding the factual findings of the IJ; the court lacks jurisdiction to review an ultimate decision denying cancellation as a matter of agency discretion; petitioner's claim that the Board's decision is internally inconsistent and unreasoned is insufficient to establish appellate jurisdiction.