DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

201728P.pdf   03/16/2021  John Pietsch  v.  Ward County
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-1728
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Western   
[PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. Plaintiffs claimed the County's right-of-way dedication ordinance violated their procedural due process rights under the Fifth and Fourteenths Amendments, and the district court granted the County defendants summary judgment. Held: plaintiffs have a remedy for unconstitutional exactions under the Takings Clause and cannot claim a redundant remedy under the due process clauses; the ordinance did not violate the Due Process Clause because it promotes the government's interest in providing public roads and is not irrational; plaintiffs received procedural due process because they were given notice of the proposed government action and an opportunity to be heard.