201743P.pdf   06/30/2021  Fred Watson  v.  Eddie Boyd, III
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-1743
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Erickson and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. In action alleging the police defendant and the 
   City of Ferguson, Missouri violated plaintiff's First, Fourth, and 
   Fourteenth Amendment rights by seizing him, searching his car, pointing a 
   gun at him and issuing him tickets for nine different violations, the 
   district court erred in denying defendants' motion for summary judgment 
   based on qualified immunity, and the matter must be remanded so that the 
   district court may further consider the police officer's asserted 
   entitlement to qualified immunity; the district court failed to adequately 
   address whether the factual disputed were material; nor can this court 
   determine whether the district court thoroughly analyzed and determined 
   the question of whether a clearly established right was involved; 
   additionally, the court defined the relevant law at too high a level of 
   generality to conduct a proper "clearly established" analysis; finally, 
   the district court's excessive force analysis failed to identify a 
   specific right or factually analogous case; because of the district 
   court's incomplete analysis on both the constitutional violation and the 
   clearly established prongs, the court can neither affirm nor reverse the 
   denial of qualified immunity, and the matter must be remanded for further 
   consideration; the City's appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as 
   the decision to remand the claims against the officer does not resolved 
   plaintiff's Monell claim against the City.