DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

201960P.pdf   07/30/2021  Lauren Hawse  v.  Faisal Khan
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-1960
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Kelly and Stras, Circuit Judges] Civil case - COVID-19. Plaintiffs challenge a public health order entered in April, 2020, in St. Louis County which included provisions limiting the size of gatherings in churches, alleging the order violated their right to free exercise of religion and freedom of expression, association and assembly, as well as the Missouri Constitution and Missouri Religious Freedom Restoration Act; the district court dismissed the suit, concluding the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing on these claims because they did not adequately alleged that an order of the court would redress their injuries. Held: the plaintiffs failed to allege sufficient factual content that would support a reasonable inference that they sought to engage in religious activities with a group of ten or more people outside a church; as a result, plaintiff failed to allege a redressable injury arising from their inability to participate in religious activities with ten or more person at their respective churches, and the district court did not err in concluding the complaint did not adequately allege that an injunction against the County's order would have redressed their injuries; alternatively, even if plaintiffs had adequately alleged Article III standing in May, 2020, any controversy over the April, 2020 order is moot in light of changed public health conditions and developments in the law governing pandemic restrictions on religious gatherings. Judge Stras, dissenting.