202086P.pdf   07/29/2021  United States  v.  Jeremy Lillich
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-2086
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Western   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Erickson and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Considering the totality of the 
   circumstances, the police officers' conduct would not have communicated to 
   a reasonable person that he was not free to decline the officers' requests 
   or otherwise terminate the encounter, and defendant's initial encounter 
   with police at a car wash was consensual and did not violate defendant's 
   Fourth Amendment rights; nor did the officers violate defendant's Fifth 
   Amendment rights during the first encounter, and defendant's statements 
   were admissible; once police seized drugs from the driver of defendant's 
   car, they had reasonable suspicion to seize the car to await a drug dog 
   sniff, and the drug dog's alert gave officers probable cause to search the 
   car and seize the drugs and cell phone they found.