DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

202431P.pdf   04/04/2022  Guadalupe Barrera Arreguin  v.  Merrick B. Garland
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-2431
                          and No:  21-1659
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Shepherd and Stras, Circuit Judges] 
   Petition for Review - Immigration. The agency did not err in determining 
   that petitioners were not entitled to asylum as they had not presented 
   evidence of past harm rising to the level of past persecution; nor did 
   they establish a well-founded fear of future persecution; because they had 
   not established past persecution, petitioners could not show they were 
   eligible for humanitarian asylum; because petitioners did not show 
   eligibility for asylum, they necessarily could not meet the more rigorous 
   standard for CAT relief; the agency did not abuse its discretion by 
   denying petitioners' motion to reopen.