DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
202500P.pdf 08/03/2022 Philip Petrone v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 20-2500
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Wollman, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Fair Labor Standards Act. In this class action commercial
truck drivers claimed they were not properly paid for off-duty time while
participating in defendants' student driver program. For the court's
previous opinion in the matter, vacating the jury's verdict and remanding
the matter, see Petrone v. Werner Enters., Inc., 940 F.3d 425 (8th Cir.
2019). On remand, the district court entered judgment for defendants,
concluding that without expert evidence, plaintiffs could not prove
damages. Plaintiffs appeal. On remand, the district court erred in failing
to conduct the requisite Rule 37(c)(1) analysis before excluding the
expert testimony; by moving for a new trial, plaintiffs sought to use the
untimely expert report to justify a new trial, which triggered the court's
obligation to conduct the Rule 37(c)(1) analysis; similarly, the district
court abused is discretion by failing to consider plaintiffs' Rule 706
request for appointment of a new expert; the district court did not err in
concluding that without testimony from an expert, plaintiffs could not
prove damages based on the pay and time data already offered in the case;
reversed and remanded for further proceedings.