DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

202518P.pdf   08/16/2021  Bryan Forrest  v.  Polaris Industries, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-2518
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Wollman and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Products liability. Plaintiffs brought this putative class 
   action alleging a design defect caused their Polaris off-road vehicles to 
   produce excessive heat; 7 of the 14 plaintiffs experienced fires which 
   destroyed their vehicles; the district court dismissed the claims of the 7 
   plaintiffs whose vehicles had not caught fire, concluding they had failed 
   to allege an injury in fact as required to establish an Article III case 
   or controversy, and these 7 non-fire plaintiffs appeal. The district court 
   correctly applied Eighth Circuit precedent in determining that the no-fire 
   purchasers failed to allege an injury sufficient to confer standing.