DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

202521P.pdf   08/25/2021  Rodenburg LLP  v.  Cincinnati Insurance Company
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-2521
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Eastern   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Colloton and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Contracts. Cincinnati issued the plaintiff law firm a 
   commercial liability policy and plaintiff sought coverage and a defense 
   when it was sued for wrongful garnishment, violation of the Fair Debt 
   Collection Practices Act and other tort-based claims after it mistakenly 
   garnished a person's wages; the district court did not err in determining 
   that the injury was excluded from coverage under the "violation of 
   statutes" exclusion; because the injured party's complaint alleged only 
   injuries arising from the law firm's violation of the Fair Debt Collection 
   Practices Act, Cincinnati did not breach is contractual duty to defend 
   plaintiff.