202788P.pdf   07/29/2021  United States  v.  Seth Ronning
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-2788
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Grasz, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. Claim that Armed Career Criminal Act 
   sentencing violated defendant's equal protection rights because it has a 
   disparate impact on non-white defendants rejected in the absence of any 
   proof of a discriminatory intent or purpose in enacting the law or in its 
   application to his case either before the district court or this court; 
   none of the convictions used as predicates for application of the Act were 
   juvenile convictions and defendant's argument that the Act has a disparate 
   impact on juvenile convictions is rejected; even if the court agrees that 
   defendant's Wisconsin robbery conviction does not qualify as an ACCA 
   predicate offense, he still had the three convictions necessary to apply 
   the Act; the district court did not err in denying defendant's request for 
   credit for time served on a prior state conviction; defendant provided no 
   proof for his claim the government improperly delayed bringing the charges 
   against him.