203028P.pdf   06/07/2022  United States  v.  Kendall Streb
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-3028
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central   
   [PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Erickson and Grasz, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Even if the government's late 
   disclosure of benefits it had provided to the victims of defendant's 
   trafficking offenses was a discovery violation, the district court did not 
   abuse its discretion by offering defendant a continuance, a jury 
   instruction and "wide open cross examination" as opposed to the remedies 
   defendant suggested, dismissal or exclusion of the victims' testimony; no 
   evidentiary hearing was necessary to determine if the government acted in 
   bad faith as the court questioned the government at length about the 
   benefits and offered defendant a continuance; challenges to evidentiary 
   ruling rejected; the evidence was sufficient to support a conviction for 
   possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime; no 
   error in imposing an enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2G1.3(b)(2)(B) for 
   unduly influencing a minor to engage in prohibited sexual conduct, or in 
   imposing an enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2G1.3(b)(3) for using a 
   smartphone in the sex offenses, or in imposing an enhancement under 
   Guidelines Sec. 4B1.5(b)(1) for engaging in pattern of prohibited sexual 
   misconduct; the court did not err in calculating defendant's criminal 
   history score as the challenged convictions were properly considered as 
   separate offenses; defendant's sentence, a substantial downward variance, 
   was not substantively unreasonable.