203046P.pdf   03/28/2022  Scott Gustafson  v.  Bi-State Development Agency
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-3046
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Erickson, author, with Loken and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Americans with Disabilities Act. The district court did not 
   abuse its discretion in determining judicial estoppel barred plaintiff's 
   allegations arising out of federal transportation regulations as he took a 
   contrary position earlier in the litigation, the district court relied on 
   those representations in denying defendant's motion for judgment on the 
   pleadings, and permitting plaintiff to now assert the position would give 
   him an unfair advantage in the litigation; the district court did not err 
   in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's 
   meaningful access claims as his evidence was not sufficient to show that 
   he was denied an opportunity to access the same services as non-disabled 
   riders; plaintiff's notice of appeal did not include the court's order 
   denying his motion to amend his complaint for the fifth time, and the 
   court lacks jurisdiction to review the denial of this motion to amend.