DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

203441P.pdf   10/04/2022  Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe  v.  Michael Houdyshell
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-3441
   U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Indian law. For the court's prior opinion in the matter see Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Haeder, 938 F.3d 941 (8th Cir. 2019). On remand, the district court again determined that a South Dakota excise tax on work performed by a nonmember contractor hired by the tribe in relation to a renovation of its casino and hotel on the Flandreau Indian Reservation was preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and the Indian Trader Statutes. The district court erred in concluding that the excise tax was preempted through the IGRA under the balancing test set forth in White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980); applying the Bracker test, the extent of federal regulation and control of casino construction is minimal, the impact on tribal interests is minimal while the state has a significant interest in raising needed revenue, and the financial and self-governance impacts on the Tribe are not significant; the Indian Trader Statutes did not preempt the excise tax, either expressly or under the Bracker test. Reversed and remanded with directions to enter judgment for the State. Judge Kelly dissenting.