DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
203441P.pdf 10/04/2022 Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Michael Houdyshell
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 20-3441
U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Indian law. For the court's prior opinion in the matter see
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Haeder, 938 F.3d 941 (8th Cir. 2019). On
remand, the district court again determined that a South Dakota excise tax
on work performed by a nonmember contractor hired by the tribe in relation
to a renovation of its casino and hotel on the Flandreau Indian
Reservation was preempted by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and
the Indian Trader Statutes. The district court erred in concluding that
the excise tax was preempted through the IGRA under the balancing test set
forth in White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136 (1980);
applying the Bracker test, the extent of federal regulation and control of
casino construction is minimal, the impact on tribal interests is minimal
while the state has a significant interest in raising needed revenue, and
the financial and self-governance impacts on the Tribe are not
significant; the Indian Trader Statutes did not preempt the excise tax,
either expressly or under the Bracker test. Reversed and remanded with
directions to enter judgment for the State. Judge Kelly dissenting.