DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

206005P.pdf   08/07/2020  Daniel Dooley  v.  Luxfer MEL Technologies
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-6005
   U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Schermer, Author, with Saladino, Chief Judge, and Sanberg, 
   Bankruptcy Judge] 
   Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Based on the bankruptcy court's decision in 
   the matter , the panel cannot determine whether the bankruptcy court erred 
   in determining that payments to Luxfer were not protected by the ordinary 
   course of business defense to a preference action; remanded to the 
   bankruptcy court to set forth the method by which it adopted 47 days as 
   the ordinary course cut-off or, alternatively, determine which preferences 
   were made in the ordinary course; in addition, the adversary complaint 
   seeks not only avoidance of the preferential transfers under Bankruptcy 
   Code Sec. 547, but the court's decision did not address recovery under 
   that section; on remand, the bankruptcy court should determine the 
   Trustee's entitlement to recovery under Sec. 550.