DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

211075P.pdf   12/01/2021  Floyd County Mutual Insurance  v.  CNH Industrial America LLC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-1075
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern   
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Stras, Circuit Judge] Civil case - Insurance. In a fire, a truck tractor and other property covered under plaintiff's policy were damaged. The loss to the tractor was $145,000, while the damage to other property was $22,781. Plaintiff alleged it met the $75,000 amount-in-controversy threshold because it could recover for both the tractor and the other property damage. The district court held the recovery was limited to the other property and it dismissed the case for failure to meet Sec. 1332's amount-in-controversy requirement. While the Iowa Supreme Court has not dealt directly with the question presented here, the court concludes that it would hold that the economic loss doctrine permits recovery only for the other property involved in the incident and not for the defective product itself; thus the Iowa Supreme Court would bar recovery in tort for damage that a defective product (here the truck tractor) causes to itself, even if the plaintiff also seeks recovery to damage to other property lost in the incident; here, plaintiff's recovery is limited as a matter of law to the alleged $22,787 in damage to the other property and the amount-in-controversy requirement is not met. Judge Stras, dissenting.