DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
211075P.pdf 12/01/2021 Floyd County Mutual Insurance v. CNH Industrial America LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-1075
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Stras, Circuit
Judge]
Civil case - Insurance. In a fire, a truck tractor and other property
covered under plaintiff's policy were damaged. The loss to the tractor was
$145,000, while the damage to other property was $22,781. Plaintiff
alleged it met the $75,000 amount-in-controversy threshold because it
could recover for both the tractor and the other property damage. The
district court held the recovery was limited to the other property and it
dismissed the case for failure to meet Sec. 1332's amount-in-controversy
requirement. While the Iowa Supreme Court has not dealt directly with the
question presented here, the court concludes that it would hold that the
economic loss doctrine permits recovery only for the other property
involved in the incident and not for the defective product itself; thus
the Iowa Supreme Court would bar recovery in tort for damage that a
defective product (here the truck tractor) causes to itself, even if the
plaintiff also seeks recovery to damage to other property lost in the
incident; here, plaintiff's recovery is limited as a matter of law to the
alleged $22,787 in damage to the other property and the
amount-in-controversy requirement is not met. Judge Stras, dissenting.