DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
211090P.pdf 07/13/2023 United States v. Ira Alan Arias
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-1090
U.S. District Court for the District of South Dakota - Northern
[PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Shepherd and Grasz, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law. After a jury convicted defendant of
aggravated sexual abuse of a child, this court remanded for in camera
review on the issue whether the refusal to allow defense counsel access to
the victim's mental health records was harmless in light of the victim's
testimony at trial that she was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress
disorder after the alleged assault by defendant, see United States v.
Arias, 936 F.3d 793 (8th Cir. 2019). Held: on remand, the district court
erred in finding the non-disclosure of the victim's mental health records
was harmless, as the victim's mental health was a hotly contested issue
throughout the proceeding, and the records included information that
tended to undermine the veracity of the victim's testimony and refuted the
unmistakable impression the victim's testimony left with the jury that the
alleged sexual assault was the underlying cause for her PTSD diagnosis;
the prosecutor's questioning of the victim as to her post-assault
diagnoses, while defendant's access to her mental health records was
restricted and his ability to cross-examine her about her mental health
diagnoses was limited, resulted in an incomplete and inaccurate picture of
the victim's mental health and deprived defendant of his constitutional
right to introduce evidence in favor of his defense. Judge Shepherd,
dissenting.