DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

211211P.pdf   05/26/2022  United States  v.  Felipe Noriega, Jr.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-1211
                          and No:  21-1324
                          and No:  21-1419
                          and No:  21-1421
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Benton and Stras, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal Law and Sentencing. The traffic stop of defendant Noriega's vehicle was not unlawfully extended based on the facts presented - defendant's nervousness, his inability to explain his travel plans, the strong odor of air freshener, and the officer's experience in drug interdiction stops; the defendants' sentences were not substantively unreasonable; a district court may vary from a Guideline on policy grounds, but it is not required to do so; the district court did not commit a procedural error when it denied defendant Cuevas's argument that he should received a mitigating role reduction under Guidelines Sec. 3B1.2(b) as he played multiple roles in the drug trafficking organization; consequently, the court did not err in applying a three-level reduction pursuant to Guidelines Sec. 2D1.1(a)(5).