DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

211471P.pdf   07/05/2022  United States  v.  Roger Counts
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-1471
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Eastern   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. The defendant's argument that the government's expert on the behavior of child sex abusers should not have been permitted to testify because the government failed to inform him that the expert had reviewed the case file fails because the government did not have to reveal that information under Rule 16(a)(1)(G); admission of a video of the victim's forensic exam did not violate defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation as the victim testified at trial, and defendant had an opportunity for effective cross-examination.