DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
211471P.pdf 07/05/2022 United States v. Roger Counts
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-1471
U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Eastern
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law. The defendant's argument that the
government's expert on the behavior of child sex abusers should not have
been permitted to testify because the government failed to inform him that
the expert had reviewed the case file fails because the government did not
have to reveal that information under Rule 16(a)(1)(G); admission of a
video of the victim's forensic exam did not violate defendant's Sixth
Amendment right to confrontation as the victim testified at trial, and
defendant had an opportunity for effective cross-examination.