DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
211572P.pdf 10/07/2022 Kimberly Ruloph v. LAMMICO
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-1572
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. Plaintiff
alleged defendant Mercy violated the Act when it transferred her to a
regional medical center after determining that she had suffered a vascular
injury it could not treat and being told by the receiving center that it
had qualified medical personnel available to treat her; when plaintiff
arrived at the center she had to be transferred to another Mercy facility
because no vascular surgeon was available at the center; because of the
delay in performing the surgery, plaintiff lost her leg. The district
court concluded that defendant Mercy made an appropriate transfer based on
the regional center's representation that it had qualified personnel
available to perform the necessary treatment. Held; the transferring
hospital is not responsible under the Act for the accuracy of the
representations of expertise made by the receiving hospital at the time
the hospitals agree to the transfer; defendant's Mercy's act of
transferring plaintiff did not violate the Act.