DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

211572P.pdf   10/07/2022  Kimberly Ruloph  v.  LAMMICO
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-1572
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith   
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. Plaintiff alleged defendant Mercy violated the Act when it transferred her to a regional medical center after determining that she had suffered a vascular injury it could not treat and being told by the receiving center that it had qualified medical personnel available to treat her; when plaintiff arrived at the center she had to be transferred to another Mercy facility because no vascular surgeon was available at the center; because of the delay in performing the surgery, plaintiff lost her leg. The district court concluded that defendant Mercy made an appropriate transfer based on the regional center's representation that it had qualified personnel available to perform the necessary treatment. Held; the transferring hospital is not responsible under the Act for the accuracy of the representations of expertise made by the receiving hospital at the time the hospitals agree to the transfer; defendant's Mercy's act of transferring plaintiff did not violate the Act.