211679P.pdf   06/06/2022  SUNZ Insurance Company  v.  Butler American Holdings Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-1679
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Grasz and Stras, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Insurance. Because defendant Payday's crossclaim is so 
   intertwined with the original interpleader claim, the district court did 
   not err in exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the nonfederal 
   claims; the district court erred in denying plaintiff's motion to compel 
   arbitration because defendant Payday contends the Program Agreement 
   between the parties which contained the arbitration clause was superseded 
   by the insurance policy, thereby rendering it void; this is a challenge to 
   the contract's validity that must be considered by an arbitrator; the 
   denial of the motion to compel arbitration of the crossclaims is reversed, 
   and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.