211685P.pdf   06/10/2022  Dana Harrison  v.  Brodie Faughn
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-1685
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Northern   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Erickson, 
   Circuit Judge] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. With respect to plaintiff O'Hara, defendant 
   Faughn, a police officer, had probable cause to conduct a traffic stop for 
   an infraction involving license plate lights, and he was entitled to 
   qualified immunity on O'Hara's Fourth Amendment claims; with respect to 
   plaintiff Hess's claims, the evidence showed Faughn was not responsible 
   for her traffic stop or her arrest, and Faughn was entitled to summary 
   judgment on Hess's claims; assuming defendants Sanders and Stacy knew of 
   Faughn's unconstitutional acts, they were entitled to summary judgment 
   because plaintiffs failed to how they were deliberately indifferent; there 
   was not any evidence that either defendant deliberately disregarded a 
   substantial risk of unconstitutional harm posed by Faughn.