211870P.pdf   07/29/2022  United States  v.  Brian Floss
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-1870
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Gruender and Grasz, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not procedurally or 
   substantively err when it thoroughly but separately explained why it was 
   imposing a revocation sentence of 36-months in prison and up to 36 months 
   of home detention as a special condition of supervised release; even if 
   the district court committed plain error in stating a 15-year term of 
   supervision was authorized by the guidelines, defendant cannot show that 
   the error affected his substantial rights because the district court 
   clearly showed that it would have imposed the same term as an upward 
   variance based on its evaluation of the circumstances of the case; the 
   court sufficiently explained why it believed the 15-year term was 
   appropriate; imposing home detention as a special condition of supervised 
   release was substantively reasonable; the matter is remanded to permit the 
   district court to conform the written judgment concerning home detention 
   with its oral pronouncement of the provision; defendant's other challenges 
   to the special conditions are rejected. Grasz, dissenting in part.