DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

211875P.pdf   03/09/2022  Far East Aluminium Works Co.  v.  Viracon, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-1875
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Erickson and Grasz, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Contracts. The district court correctly determined that 
   plaintiff could not recover under the consequential-damages exclusion 
   provision in the parties' contract; such a provision is not unconscionable 
   under Minn. Stat. Sec. 336.2-719(3) and is enforceable even if plaintiff's 
   remaining contract remedy fails of its essential purpose under Sec. 
   336.2-719(2).