DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

211996P.pdf   04/26/2022  Aspro, Inc.  v.  CIR
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-1996
   United States Tax Court   
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Chief Judge Smith and Judge Kobes, Circuit Judges] Tax Court - Tax. In tax dispute whether management fees paid to stockholders were deductible, as compensation for services or disguised distribution of corporate earnings, the tax court did not clearly err in finding Aspro failed to show the management fees were reasonable and did not present evidence showing what like enterprises under like circumstances would ordinarily pay for like management services. The management fees were paid in proportion to the stockholders' interests, the process of setting the fees was unstructured, and the fees bore no relation to the services rendered by the stockholders. Payments were made as lump sums at the end of the tax years and dividends were not paid. Tax Court did not abuse its discretion in excluding taxpayer's experts, as one did not assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or determine a fact in issue and instead relied on personal experience, and the other expert merely summarized the facts in the light favorable to the taxpayer based on his personal belief.