DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
211996P.pdf 04/26/2022 Aspro, Inc. v. CIR
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-1996
United States Tax Court
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Chief Judge Smith and Judge Kobes,
Circuit Judges]
Tax Court - Tax. In tax dispute whether management fees paid to
stockholders were deductible, as compensation for services or disguised
distribution of corporate earnings, the tax court did not clearly err in
finding Aspro failed to show the management fees were reasonable and did
not present evidence showing what like enterprises under like
circumstances would ordinarily pay for like management services. The
management fees were paid in proportion to the stockholders' interests,
the process of setting the fees was unstructured, and the fees bore no
relation to the services rendered by the stockholders. Payments were made
as lump sums at the end of the tax years and dividends were not paid. Tax
Court did not abuse its discretion in excluding taxpayer's experts, as one
did not assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or determine a
fact in issue and instead relied on personal experience, and the other
expert merely summarized the facts in the light favorable to the taxpayer
based on his personal belief.