212026P.pdf   09/02/2022  Frederick Rozo  v.  Principal Life Insurance Co.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-2026
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Colloton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - ERISA. For the court's prior opinion in the matter holding 
   defendant was a fiduciary, see Rozo v. Principal Life Ins. Co., 949 F.3d 
   1071 (8th Cir. 2021). On remand, the district court found defendant had 
   not breached its fiduciary duties to participants in the Principal Fixed 
   Income Option 401(k) plan; the deducts defendant took were reasonable and 
   represented its reasonable expenses of administering the plan; the 
   district court did not clearly err in finding that the deducts were set in 
   the participant's interests; with respect to plaintiff's claim that 
   defendant engaged in prohibited self-dealing, defendant was exempt from 
   liability for receiving reasonable compensation.