DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
212188P.pdf 04/22/2022 NLRB v. Noah's Ark Processors, LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-2188
National Labor Relations Board
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Shepherd and Stras, Circuit Judges]
Petition for Enforcement - National Labor Relations Act. NLRB seeks
enforcement of decision adopting findings that Noah's Ark committed
multiple unfair labor practices by failing to bargain in good faith for a
successor collective bargaining agreement, withholding relevant bargaining
information, unlawfully declaring a impasse and unilaterally implementing
altered conditions of employment and also concluding Noah's Ark unlawfully
threatened and terminated ten workers who engaged in an unauthorized work
stoppage. The Board adopted the ALJ's proposed remedies, with one dissent.
As for the work stoppage claim, there was substantial evidence that Noah's
Ark fired the employees and that the employees were terminated for
engaging in a protected concerted work stoppage. The employees were
represented by a union and the union did not authorize the work stoppage,
but the Board's determination that the work stoppage was not unprotected
because Noah's Ark did not prove the ten employees attempted to circumvent
their union and bargain directly with the employer is supported by the
record and thus the we enforce the Board's determination that Noah's Ark
violated section 8(a)(1) when it terminated ten employees. Substantial
evidence supports the Board's finding that Noah's Ark did not negotiate to
a valid impasse, as Noah's Ark did not make reasonable effort at good
faith bargaining. The remedies imposed were not an abuse of the Board's
substantial discretion. Judge Stras concurs in part and in the judgment.