DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

212210P.pdf   08/05/2022  Marjory Thomas Osborn-Vincent  v.  American Express Financial
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-2210
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Erickson, Author, with Melloy and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case. For the court's prior opinion in the matter, see Estate of 
   Osborn-Vincent v. Am. Express Fin. Corp., 835 F. App'x 167 (8th Cir. 
   2021). On remand, the district court did not err in finding defendants had 
   properly served the personal representative under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4; nor 
   did the court err in concluding substitution of the personal 
   representative was timely and proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a); the 
   court had personal jurisdiction over the personal representative of the 
   estate, who is bound by the terms of the settlement agreement in the 
   matter and thereby precluded from pursuing a separate action in Oregon.