DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

212286P.pdf   08/30/2022  United States  v.  Muzammil Ali
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-2286
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central   
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Colloton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's last-minute request for a trial continuance as defendant had adequate time to prepare for trial and he and his attorney acknowledged they were ready for trial; defendant's Sixth Amendment speedy trial rights had not been violated; the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting excerpts of defendant's jail house calls, where the court found the remainder of the recordings contained statements that were hearsay, unfairly prejudicial, irrelevant, or potentially confusing; the district court did not abuse its discretion by rejecting defendant's request for a downward variance.