DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

212626P.pdf   04/26/2022  David Gamble  v.  Minnesota State-Operated Svcs
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-2626
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Benton and Erickson, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - Fair Labor Standards Act. Civil detainees who participate in voluntary Vocational Work Program in the Minnesota Sex Offender Program sued state defendants that they failed to pay minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Detainees are paid $10 per hour but the state withholds up to 50% of the wages for the cost of their care. The district court concluded the detainees were not employees and alternatively that defendants were immune under the Portal-to- Portal Act. Sexually dangerous civil detainees are not state employees, there is not bargained-for exchange of labor for mutual economic gain; detainees are under the control and supervision of the detention facility; the purpose of the program is to provide treatment; the program does not generate profits; the detainees have their basic needs met by the state, including medical care and meals. The detainees' arguments that used of their labor creates unfair competition is not convincing, as the program does not provide goods or services to private entities and program must consult with the labor market to ensure the activities are in the best interests of the stakeholders. Because the detainees are not employees, we need not decide if defendants are immune.