DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

212707P.pdf   09/13/2022  Ritchie Spec. Cred. Investments  v.  JPMorgan Chase & Co.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-2707
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Stras, Author, with Grasz and Kobes, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case. In action to recover losses from the Tom Petters Ponzi scheme, 
   plaintiff lacked bankruptcy standing as to all but one of the claims it 
   was trying to assert as the claims belong to the trustee; the complaint 
   failed to allege sufficient facts to state an aiding-and-abetting claim 
   against Richter Consulting as it did not plausibly show that Richter had 
   actual knowledge that Petters was engaged in fraud.