212941P.pdf   07/05/2022  Jay Nygard  v.  City of Orono
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-2941
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Benton and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. The city zoning ordinance regarding permits for 
   building projects was not unconstitutionally vague, and the district court 
   did not err in dismissing plaintiffs' as-applied vagueness challenge; the 
   district court did not err in dismissing plaintiffs' abuse-of-process 
   claims because such claims target the misuse of the legal process, not a 
   city's permitting process; the district court did not err in dismissing 
   plaintiff Jay Nygard's malicious prosecution claim as the city had a 
   reasonable belief that probable cause existed to prosecute him based on 
   state court judge's finding of probable cause; however, plaintiffs have 
   sufficiently alleged a lack of probable cause to prosecute plaintiff 
   Kendall Nygard as city officials had no knowledge of her involvement in 
   the disputed activities and they failed to investigate it before moving to 
   prosecute her; the dismissal of her malicious prosecution is reversed, and 
   the matter is remanded for further proceedings.