212974P.pdf   08/01/2022  United States  v.  Shaun Farrington
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-2974
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Colloton and Melloy, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. A delay of a few hours between a drug dog 
   sniff and the securing of a warrant and the opening of defendant's 
   lockboxes did not violate defendant's Fourth Amendment rights, and the 
   court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress; the court did 
   not err in denying defendant's motion to strike a juror who had previously 
   corresponded with a government witness, a police officer to whom she had 
   reported a possible crime, as the juror stated she could remain fair and 
   would listen to the officer's testimony before deciding if she believe it; 
   the juror's explicit statement of impartiality defeats defendant's attempt 
   to show actual partiality; the district court did not abuse its discretion 
   in denying defendant's motion to admit additional portions of a jailhouse 
   recording as defendant failed to show how the additional portion was 
   necessary to explain or contextualize the admitted portion, correct a 
   misleading impression, or ensure a fair and impartial understanding.